|
Today, the penalties for driving
while intoxicated in Texas have never been more
severe. For example, DWI is the only misdemeanor
criminal offense for which you cannot receive
deferred adjudication. Moreover, new laws require
that if your license is suspend for DWI, you will
be required to pay a minimum of $1,000 per year
for three years just to keep your license. Because
of these and many other extra penalties associated
with DWI, Michael Lowe often advises his DWI clients
to try their case to a jury. As a former misdemeanor
prosecutor with the Dallas County District Attorney’s
Office, Mr. Lowe knows the difference an experienced
DWI lawyer can make in a jury trial.
Mr. Lowe will obtain a copy
of the police report and videotape and help you
evaluate your options. Mr. Lowe will defend you
both at your license suspension hearing and at
trial by vigorously cross-examining the arresting
officers and the intoxilizer 5000 technical supervisor.
If your license is suspended Mr. Lowe can also
get you an occupational license during the suspension
period.
Just because you have given
a breath test and the result is an .08 (g/210
liters) or higher, doesn’t mean you don’t
have a chance. Here just some of the proven ways
of beating the breath test on DWI cases in Texas:
40 POTENTIAL DEFENSES TO BREATH TESTS
1. Manifestations and actions of defendant don=t
match test (use third party witnesses to establish
the contrary facts).
2. Officer untrained or marginally trained and
cannot explain anything about how breath testing
works.
3. Officer fails to follow breath test training
manual protocol, just like a cook not following
a recipe or a doctor skipping steps in performing
an operation.
4. Officer fails to follow own training protocol
from breath test school (e.g., not waiting the
fifteen minute waiting period).
5. Defendant has a physical problem or health
limitation, which officer did not ask about or
request alternative type test (e.g., emphysema,
dentures and spongy adhesives adhering them in
subject=s mouth and so on).
6. Testing room or circuitry has a problem (RFI;
recently painted walls or trim; certain cleaning
solutions, smoking in or near machine; shared
power supply with heater or other appliance B
must be dedicated Aclean@ electrical source;
machine may have been Amalfunctioning@).
7. Defendant has had environmental exposure
to volatile chemicals and will have cumulative
reading of any ethanol plus readings from these
other volatiles. (See National Law Journal, New
drunken-driving defense cause a stir, April 18,
1088, p. 7.)
8. Defendant unable to blow sufficient sample
due to lung capacity or size, respiratory health
or high alcohol level (e.g., many Intoxilyzer
5000 machines are equipped with pressure switches
and require sufficient time, pressure and a proper
Aslope@ of the alcohol curve to deliver a valid
reading).
9. Improper or inadequate inspections by state
inspectors (example: no linearity proven, or
single tests being run at the target alcohol
concentrations).
10. Use of machine after factory repair is made
but before new calibration check is one by inspector
or breath instrument supervisor at police department
site.
11. Air bag defenses B Athe Tyndall effect@
B diffusion of light; propellant exposure; cut
lips; lung and airway irritation and fluid buildup
from caustic gas propellant. (See DWI Journal:
Law & Science, vol.15, No. 10, October, 2000.)
12. Videotape refutes the high reading, supports
sobriety, based on voice, demeanor and ability
to perform field tests reasonably well.
13. High test result, yet defendant never urinates
for three to four hours or more B physiological.
14. Something in person=s mouth containing alcohol
(ex: Breath Drops7 with SD alcohol).
15. Something in mouth that contains interfering
or contaminating substance (Skoal7 snuff B wintergreen;
Altoids7).
16. Dentures, gingivitis, bridgework, Apockets@
(video or photo of this and dental records).
17. Vomiting, belching within fifteen to twenty
minutes of test and no rinsing of mouth permitted,
or inadequate deprivation period before retest
is started.
18. Insufficient observation period, as per
breath test training manual.
19. Actual improper or out of Aagreement@ tests,
without follow-up tests to correct (e.g., both
results must be within 0.02 of each other, as
per the law of Texas).
20. Police report supports sobriety, or lack
of investigation of alternative causes.
21. Rising BAC showing time of driving BAC would
have been lower than time of testing.
22. Elevated breath temperature cause by fever,
hot tub, sauna, detention in hot sun or back
of patrol car in summer, dancing menstrual cycle,
menopause (hot flashes) and so forth.
23. Failure to verify simulator temperature
remains constant and within tolerance; otherwise,
results cannot be accurate. Reference sample
must be between 33.8N and 34.2N Celsius.
24. Assumed breath-blood ratio (2,100:1) not
proven to be defendant=s ratio; show how minor
error gets multiplied by an algorithm of 1,000
to 3,000, depending on type of machine used.
Example: on an Intoxilyzer 5000, an indicated
1.20 result, if accurate, contains only 17/10,000,000th
of an ounce. The algorithm for the Intoxilyzer
results in a multiplier of 2, 592 (derived from
the 81-cc size of the sample chamber as compared
to 210 liters of air). Any minor error can skew
results dramatically. (Some states have case
law or statutes that eliminate this defense.)
25. Show defendant has abnormally low blood
or breath conversation ratio through testing
or experts. (Some states have case law or statutes
that eliminate this defense.)
26. No proper periodic calibration checks using
quantities of commonly occurring interfering
substances (e.g., toluene, acetone, acetaldehyde)
likely found in a living subject, to assure machine=s
ability to distinguish alcohol from other volatiles.
27. Burp, belch that is silent.
28. Gastric reflux or hiatal hernia, preferably
diagnosed and treated before arrest occurred
(bring the Ascope@ photos taken during endoscopic
surgery by a physician).
29. Random vials of simulator solutions not
checked by GC-mass spec analysis upon receipt
from company that sells them, therefore, no assurance
of precision for target alcohol concentrations.
30. Inherent Asampling variability@ or Amargin
of error@ issues (e.g., 0.088 reading in an 0.08
state, and manual acknowledges " 0.01 or " 0.02
precision problem).
31. Blowing pattern irregularities (blubbering
and crying causing artificially high water vapor
problem; mucus buildup from cold, sinus infection
can trap alcohol and increase BrAC).
32. Prosecutor fails to lay a proper evidentiary
foundation for admissions of the test.
33. Defendant of strict high protein diet, then
ingests carbohydrates, thereby triggering autogenerated
alcohol production when ketones (accumulated
from the diet) are converted to isopropyl alcohol.
34. Failure to give timely, complete or Acorrect@
implied consent warning. (The Erdmann doctrine.)
35. Defendant has diabetes, is Aborderline@
diabetic or is hypoglycemic and consumes alcohol
in any amount, causing conversion of high acetone
levels into isopropyl alcohol.
36. Officer obtains first set of BAC results,
which will not support a per se case, then waits
a few more minutes and retests, obtaining a reading
above the per se limit B illegal.
37. State fails to prove the alcohol was consumed
either during driving or before driving ended.
38. Officer fails to get his or her annual or
periodic updates in training, thereby disqualifying
the test operator from administering tests.
39. In handling case, office commits crime (e.g.,
obstruction of justice or perjury) in an effort
to conceal evidence; prosecutor cannot proceed
to trial or (more commonly) officer makes an
illegal, warrantless stop or arrests person without
probable cause.
40. "FIRD" defense. Officer gets
fired, indicted, retires (and moves away) or
dies.
Areas of Practice
- Drugs
-
DWI &
DUI
-
Assault
-
Sex
Crimes
-
Appeals
-
Felonies
-
Misdemeanors
-
Expunge
Records
- and
More
News & Events
Today's Headlines
- POLICE REPORTS: Two hospitalized in wreck - Nacogdoches Daily Sentinel
( Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:54:00 GMT ) POLICE REPORTS: Two hospitalized in wreck Nacogdoches Daily Sentinel, TX - 5 hours ago According to the Texas Department of Public ... 214 West California St., driving while intoxicated; Teddy Wade ... Kendrick Loron Nash, 27, Dallas, probation revocation ... |
- Valley Hispanics drink more than ever, and there are few places ... - Monitor
( Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:03:00 GMT )
- Raiders can offensive coordinator - North County Times
( Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:37:00 GMT ) Raiders can offensive coordinator North County Times, CA - Nov 29, 2006 ... invisible, staying at his home in Texas instead of ... of two seasons with the Dallas Cowboys ... family, three days after being charged with driving while intoxicated. ... |
- Parcells never liked Vanderjagt - Winnipeg Sun
( Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:09:00 GMT ) Parcells never liked Vanderjagt Winnipeg Sun, Canada - Nov 28, 2006 IRVING, Texas -- A day after cutting the NFL's ... the high-priced kicker the Dallas Cowboys signed ... three days after being charged with driving while intoxicated. ... |
- NFL NOTEBOOK: Raiders replace offensive coordinator - SouthCoastToday.com
( Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:44:00 GMT ) NFL NOTEBOOK: Raiders replace offensive coordinator SouthCoastToday.com, MA - Nov 28, 2006 ... family, three days after being charged with driving while intoxicated. ... suffered a heart attack while driving in a ... high-priced kicker the Dallas Cowboys signed ... |
|