<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Watch: Court of Crim Appeals Says Not Unfair to Defendant Hood for Judge and DA to Have Affair During Trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dallasjustice.com/dallascriminallawyerblog/judge-watch-court-of-crim-appeals-says-not-unfair-to-defendant-hood-for-judge-and-da-to-have-affair-during-trial/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dallasjustice.com/dallascriminallawyerblog/judge-watch-court-of-crim-appeals-says-not-unfair-to-defendant-hood-for-judge-and-da-to-have-affair-during-trial</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: latest news</title>
		<link>http://www.dallasjustice.com/dallascriminallawyerblog/judge-watch-court-of-crim-appeals-says-not-unfair-to-defendant-hood-for-judge-and-da-to-have-affair-during-trial/comment-page-1#comment-69503</link>
		<dc:creator>latest news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dallasjustice.com/dallascriminallawyerblog/?p=187#comment-69503</guid>
		<description>Thanks for each of your hard work on this web page. Debby loves managing internet research and it is easy to see why. I learn all about the lively way you convey both useful and interesting guidelines on the website and as well encourage participation from people on that matter while my simple princess has always been understanding a great deal. Enjoy the remaining portion of the new year. You have been performing a dazzling job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for each of your hard work on this web page. Debby loves managing internet research and it is easy to see why. I learn all about the lively way you convey both useful and interesting guidelines on the website and as well encourage participation from people on that matter while my simple princess has always been understanding a great deal. Enjoy the remaining portion of the new year. You have been performing a dazzling job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy George</title>
		<link>http://www.dallasjustice.com/dallascriminallawyerblog/judge-watch-court-of-crim-appeals-says-not-unfair-to-defendant-hood-for-judge-and-da-to-have-affair-during-trial/comment-page-1#comment-23816</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dallasjustice.com/dallascriminallawyerblog/?p=187#comment-23816</guid>
		<description>A matter that needs investigated
On case#VA107160
People Vs buddy lee George 
Norwalk superior court norwalk California division S
Judge the Honorable Roger Ito
Los Angeles county district attorney Kang. 
A case that can be proved as unconstitutional due to the following
1.) I was denied my due process rights. 
2.) the district attorney had me charged with prison priors and strikes that I did not have and it was not until after the verdict did she admit her mistakes. 
3.) I was denied to confront witnesses I supoened 5 officers and only one showed up. 
4.) the only witness that showed up was detective hakala from Whittier police department he was the lead detective and expert witness. 
5.) the was bias with the processing of evidence he used his own lab. 
6.) he lied under oath by saying he removed the drugs before the pre search video because he had a dog. 
7.) the evidence in the case had been destroyed before the trial
 Evidence was destroyed 5-29-09
The verdict was read on 8-15-09
8.) the attorney that represented me right before the trial caused a conflict of interest by violating attorney client privilege by having a meeting with the city of la mirada without my permission nor knowledge were he discussed my case were he was convinced by the city saying I should take a deal under the condition I move out of la mirada when I get out of prison. 
9.) Henry salcido also told me at one point he didn&#039;t care If I was innocent or guilty I should take a deal. 
10.) he also told me at one point he was best friends with steve Cooley and if I gave him $180.000 and sign over the deed to our home he could make the case disappear. 
11.) their was two retired district attorneys that were working for Henry salcidos law firm that were also over familiar with sheriffs and narcotics department that were involved in my case. 
12.) through the whole case the la mirada mayor and council members had law enforcement harassing me their was about 300 or more calls made to law enforcement with the intent to have me harassed 
13.) I can also prove false imprisonment. 
14.) I was charged with possession for sales when no drugs were ever found to be in my possessing neither was any money ever recovered and according to the detective he found 13 dollars worth of drugs in our home all together in separate bags. 
15.) it was unconstitutional for detective hakala to target me when their was 5 occupants living in our home at the time. 
16.) the search warrant he used to get in our home the day he supposedly found the drugs was stamped denied. 
17.) the second search warrant had a type -o- error and the name on the search warrant was Walter Eugene Farris a guy that I don&#039;t know and neither did any one els that lived in our home and he had never been in our home. 
18.)The attorney that represented me during the trial had not been given enough to to familiarize her self with my case the judge refused to give her time to overlook the case. 
19.) after we picked the jurors one of the jurors was prejudice he said no matter what he would find me guilty because he hates drug dealers the judge still allowed juror # 19 to hang out with all the other jurors until he was replaced. 
The following needs to be investigated
1.) violation of due process rights
2.) my state and federal rights were violated. 
3.) false imprisonment
4.) harassment 
5.) negligent
6.) malpractice
7.) wrongful conviction
8.) officer misconduct
9.) judicial misconduct
10.) cruel and unusual punishment. Email below evidence when the evidence had been destroyed a email from detective hakala to district attorney kang. 
11.) the city of la mirada offered to buy our home at cost saying under the condition I couldn&#039;t live in la mirada nor Whittier. 
12.)la mirada law enforcement was raiding our home practically daily. 
13.) before this case started detective jerry Reyes told me as he handed me his card with his hand writing on it that if I dident help him he would fuck me. 
14.) detective hakala and district attorney kang kept inflicting lies on the jury. 
    
Buddy George - VA107160From: joanne alberry
View Contact To: LAURIE YTARTE -----------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
-- Laurie,here is the email from the Detective 
telling the court that all the property was
destroyed. Sorry about all of it. Feel free to mail
me any payments you can at my office address
4229 Main St Suite 4 Riverside CA 92501 I will
let you know when I find an attorney who will
take on a governemtn entity. good luck to you
and Buddy,Joanne ---------- Forwarded message
----------From: Date: Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:23
AMSubject: Fw: Buddy George - VA107160To:
joannealberry@gmail.com Hi Joanne, Per our
conversation, here is the email from Detective
Hakala confirming that the evidence was
destroyed. I will request that our matter be taken
off calendar today. Thanks. ----------------------
Forwarded by Miriam Kang/DAUsers/NLADA on
09/25/2009 07:22 AM --------------------------- To:
cc: Subject: RE: Buddy George - VA107160 I
contacted our central property and the items
seized in the Buddy George case (408-15814-
0460-184) were dispoed on 05-29-09. Any other
questions just let me know. Eric ---------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
From: MKang@da.lacounty.gov
[mailto:MKang@da.lacounty.gov]Sent: Thu
9/24/2009 2:49 PMTo: Hakala, Eric J.Subject:
Buddy George - VA107160 Hi Detective Hakala,
Just as a reminder, please email me a letter
confirming that the the property booked into
evidence for this case has been disposed of and
the date of disposal. Thanks so much!
Sincerely,Miriam KangDeputy District
AttorneyTel: 562-807-7211 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A matter that needs investigated<br />
On case#VA107160<br />
People Vs buddy lee George <br />
Norwalk superior court norwalk California division S<br />
Judge the Honorable Roger Ito<br />
Los Angeles county district attorney Kang. <br />
A case that can be proved as unconstitutional due to the following<br />
1.) I was denied my due process rights. <br />
2.) the district attorney had me charged with prison priors and strikes that I did not have and it was not until after the verdict did she admit her mistakes. <br />
3.) I was denied to confront witnesses I supoened 5 officers and only one showed up. <br />
4.) the only witness that showed up was detective hakala from Whittier police department he was the lead detective and expert witness. <br />
5.) the was bias with the processing of evidence he used his own lab. <br />
6.) he lied under oath by saying he removed the drugs before the pre search video because he had a dog. <br />
7.) the evidence in the case had been destroyed before the trial<br />
 Evidence was destroyed 5-29-09<br />
The verdict was read on 8-15-09<br />
8.) the attorney that represented me right before the trial caused a conflict of interest by violating attorney client privilege by having a meeting with the city of la mirada without my permission nor knowledge were he discussed my case were he was convinced by the city saying I should take a deal under the condition I move out of la mirada when I get out of prison. <br />
9.) Henry salcido also told me at one point he didn&#8217;t care If I was innocent or guilty I should take a deal. <br />
10.) he also told me at one point he was best friends with steve Cooley and if I gave him $180.000 and sign over the deed to our home he could make the case disappear. <br />
11.) their was two retired district attorneys that were working for Henry salcidos law firm that were also over familiar with sheriffs and narcotics department that were involved in my case. <br />
12.) through the whole case the la mirada mayor and council members had law enforcement harassing me their was about 300 or more calls made to law enforcement with the intent to have me harassed <br />
13.) I can also prove false imprisonment. <br />
14.) I was charged with possession for sales when no drugs were ever found to be in my possessing neither was any money ever recovered and according to the detective he found 13 dollars worth of drugs in our home all together in separate bags. <br />
15.) it was unconstitutional for detective hakala to target me when their was 5 occupants living in our home at the time. <br />
16.) the search warrant he used to get in our home the day he supposedly found the drugs was stamped denied. <br />
17.) the second search warrant had a type -o- error and the name on the search warrant was Walter Eugene Farris a guy that I don&#8217;t know and neither did any one els that lived in our home and he had never been in our home. <br />
18.)The attorney that represented me during the trial had not been given enough to to familiarize her self with my case the judge refused to give her time to overlook the case. <br />
19.) after we picked the jurors one of the jurors was prejudice he said no matter what he would find me guilty because he hates drug dealers the judge still allowed juror # 19 to hang out with all the other jurors until he was replaced. <br />
The following needs to be investigated<br />
1.) violation of due process rights<br />
2.) my state and federal rights were violated. <br />
3.) false imprisonment<br />
4.) harassment <br />
5.) negligent<br />
6.) malpractice<br />
7.) wrongful conviction<br />
8.) officer misconduct<br />
9.) judicial misconduct<br />
10.) cruel and unusual punishment. Email below evidence when the evidence had been destroyed a email from detective hakala to district attorney kang. <br />
11.) the city of la mirada offered to buy our home at cost saying under the condition I couldn&#8217;t live in la mirada nor Whittier. <br />
12.)la mirada law enforcement was raiding our home practically daily. <br />
13.) before this case started detective jerry Reyes told me as he handed me his card with his hand writing on it that if I dident help him he would fuck me. <br />
14.) detective hakala and district attorney kang kept inflicting lies on the jury. <br />
    <br />
Buddy George &#8211; VA107160From: joanne alberry<br />
View Contact To: LAURIE YTARTE &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8211; Laurie,here is the email from the Detective <br />
telling the court that all the property was<br />
destroyed. Sorry about all of it. Feel free to mail<br />
me any payments you can at my office address<br />
4229 Main St Suite 4 Riverside CA 92501 I will<br />
let you know when I find an attorney who will<br />
take on a governemtn entity. good luck to you<br />
and Buddy,Joanne &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Forwarded message<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-From: Date: Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:23<br />
AMSubject: Fw: Buddy George &#8211; VA107160To:<br />
<a href="mailto:joannealberry@gmail.com">joannealberry@gmail.com</a> Hi Joanne, Per our<br />
conversation, here is the email from Detective<br />
Hakala confirming that the evidence was<br />
destroyed. I will request that our matter be taken<br />
off calendar today. Thanks. &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Forwarded by Miriam Kang/DAUsers/NLADA on<br />
09/25/2009 07:22 AM &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; To:<br />
cc: Subject: RE: Buddy George &#8211; VA107160 I<br />
contacted our central property and the items<br />
seized in the Buddy George case (408-15814-<br />
0460-184) were dispoed on 05-29-09. Any other<br />
questions just let me know. Eric &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
From: <a href="mailto:MKang@da.lacounty.gov">MKang@da.lacounty.gov</a><br />
[mailto:MKang@da.lacounty.gov]Sent: Thu<br />
9/24/2009 2:49 PMTo: Hakala, Eric J.Subject:<br />
Buddy George &#8211; VA107160 Hi Detective Hakala,<br />
Just as a reminder, please email me a letter<br />
confirming that the the property booked into<br />
evidence for this case has been disposed of and<br />
the date of disposal. Thanks so much!<br />
Sincerely,Miriam KangDeputy District<br />
AttorneyTel: 562-807-7211 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

