December 16th, 2009

DA Watch: Death Row’s Henry Skinner sues Fed Prosecutor Lynn Switzer for Withholding DNA Evidence He Says Clears Him

The United States Supreme Court is already considering Henry Skinner’s petition for certiorari (09-7784), which he filed after his 1999 petition for writ of habeas corpus with the Amarillo federal district court (Skinner v. Quartman) was denied, and after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals initially granted him a certificate of appealability on two issues relating to his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in the guilt phase of his trial.  The 5th Circuit thereafter changed its mind, affirming the lower court’s decision  – which promptly set Skinner’s execution date for Feb. 24, 2010. 

But Skinner isn’t stopping with an appellate fight that he didn’t have adequate defense counsel — this Death Row inmate, represented by lead counsel Robert Owen of the UT School of Law Capital Punishment Center, is also challenging the prosecutor’s work during trial.

That’s right: the Death Row inmate is suing the prosecutor who tried his capital murder case. 

Henry Skinner is alleging that federal prosecutor Lynn Switzer has — right now — DNA evidence that could prove his innocence, and is refusing to release it.  Refusing, even though he’s set to die within 90 days.

According to Skinner (from his federal complaint)

“On October 20,2009, without giving Plaintiff’s attorneys any notice or an opportunity to be heard, the 31st District Court entered an order directing that Plaintiff be executed by intravenous injection ‘at any time after the hour of 6:00 p.m. on the 24th day of February, 2010 …. Defendant’s refusal to release the biological evidence for testing violates Plaintiffs Fourteenth Amendment right to due process and his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. Plaintiff requests of this Court an order declaring that Defendant’s continued withholding of the evidence violates Plaintiffs constitutional rights and requiring that Defendant release the evidence to Plaintiff under a reasonable protocol regarding chain of custody and preservation of the evidence, in order that Plaintiff can have the evidence tested at his own expense.”

Henry Skinner is scheduled to die in a matter of weeks, and he has to have some comfort in the dogged efforts that his appellate lawyers are undertaking on his behalf.  Harvard Law graduate and UT Law Professor Bob Owen and his team at the UT’s Capital Punishment Clinic are working hard here — one can only hope their efforts will not be in vain.

4 Responses to “DA Watch: Death Row’s Henry Skinner sues Fed Prosecutor Lynn Switzer for Withholding DNA Evidence He Says Clears Him”

  1. DURAND Christiane says:

    WHY no DNA testing for SKINNER, while in Florida, TO DAY, BAIN was released thanks to this test?
    Like for Michael TONEY, it seems that the TRUTH has nothing to do with SKINNER’s sentence….as a paralegal, he was boring “them”, so, better get rid of him! This is my feeling.

  2. Mary says:

    “The 5th Circuit thereafter changed its mind”, how does that happen? Who got to the 5th and why…who is Skinner taking the fall for that has some mighlty big pull?

  3. TDCJ DR CO says:

    I feel that Mr. Skinner is innocent of the charges against him, I am a former Correctional Officer at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice A.B. Polunsky Unit Death Row Sector I have worked the POD that Mr. Skinner has lived on for many days at a time and have had the opportunity to speak with him on multipul times he has spoken with me about his case and he seems sincere in the fact that he is inocent and I personally believe that at the time of the murders Mr. Skinner was to incompacitated by the amount of alcohol and narcotics in his system that he would be unable to commit the crimes. I have reviewed his case and have seen his case on Tru tv several times and have noticed alot of discrepencies in the evidence presented.

  4. Lynn Switzer is about as interested in seeing justice served as was her predecessor. (You all may remember him as “The Dope Dealing D.A.” (Richard James Roach) with whom Lynn Switzer was such a close personal ASSistant (emphasis added for a very good reason as I was there). Check out the website referenced in my info for more criminal acts committed by her. But, of course we were asking a TEXAS court to see her crimes and what is she but criminal, worthles filth as are the rest who refuse to see her crimes. I can say this and mean it.

Leave a Reply