Archive for the ‘Crime News’ Category

October 27th, 2010

Fix Found? New Rules To Deal With Driver Responsibility Program’s $2 Billion Unpaid Surcharges and 2+ Yr DWI Case Backlog

The Texas Public Safety Commission adopted changes to the Driver Responsibility Program rules this week, and these will become effective next month.  We’ve written about these surcharges before.   

Attempt to Resolve the Huge Backlog of DWI Cases Across the State of Texas

It seems that criminal judges across the state were the incentive for these new rules, because they were reporting to the TPSC that the notorious two (2) year backlog of DWI cases across the state was due in large part to the DWI Surcharges since those accused of driving drunk and charged with DWI (driving while intoxicated) were opting to take their chances at trial and not take a deal.

Before these changes, Texas drivers convicted of DWI (driving while intoxicated) as well as a couple of other violations (driving without a driver’s license, or one that’s invalid; as well as driving without insurance) had to pay automatic surcharges every year, for three years from the date of conviction.  The surcharge was high: $1,000 a year for three years for a first conviction; $1,500 a year for the second; and $2,000 a year for any conviction with a blood-alcohol content of 0.16 or greater. 

People just weren’t paying these surcharges.  Over $1 billion hasn’t been paid state-wide, because some folk can’t afford these surcharges and others just rebel against them: they’re driving without a license rather than forking over these bucks.

The Changes They’ve Made in Response to $1 Billion Surcharge Receivables and 2+year DWI case backlog

So, here are the changes that are being made under the new rules according to this week’s TPSC press release:

The Amnesty program

• Will apply to individuals who have been in default, and the Department will determine the time in default for each amnesty period
• Will reduce amount to 10 percent of total surcharges owed, not to exceed $250
• Will rescind suspension for those who receive amnesty while payments are being made

The Indigency program:

• Will apply to individuals at or below 125 percent of poverty level, using a sworn affidavit
• Will reduce amount to 10 percent of total surcharges owed, not to exceed $250
• Will rescind suspension for those who receive indigency while payments are being made

The Incentive program will apply to individuals above 125 percent and below 300 percent of poverty level, using a sworn affidavit.

Individuals will pay a reduced amount if all three years are paid in full:

• Pay 50 percent of what’s owed if paid within 30 days after notice
• Pay 60 percent if paid within 60 days after notice
• Pay 70 percent if paid within 90 days after notice

OR

• Reduced payments for continued compliance
• First year, pay 100 percent
• Second year, reduced by 50 percent
•  Third year, reduced by 75 percent

The programs will be phased in over several months, with the Amnesty program being implemented during tax season. The Indigency program will be implemented immediately after the Amnesty period ends. The Incentive program will be evaluated for implementation.

September 8th, 2010

Paris Hilton – Special Treatment During Cocaine Bust or At the Station? Sure. You Betcha.

Usually, this blog serves as a record of bad acts by Texas law enforcement, prosecutors, judges, or other members of the local criminal justice system. 

However, it’s just too tempting to ponder the latest antics of Paris Hilton, after reading that long before her recent felony arrest, Ms. Hilton tweeted a photo of the identical purse she initially denied was her property at the scene.   You almost want to send a big, big bottle of Excedrin to her defense attorney, right?  (Check out the pretty little purse here from Paris Hilton’s twitter feed.)

Paris Hilton – an Exception to the Rule

The short version of the story, which you’ve probably heard by now – on Letterman or Leno, if not in the local news – is that Paris was pulled over in Las Vegas and somehow (D’oh!) what appeared to be cocaine was discovered in a purse — yep, the one that is the subject of all the tabloid photographs.  Paris initially said it wasn’t hers, of course. 

Paris Hilton was subsequently arrested by Las Vegas law enforcment for felony possession of cocaine.

Taken down to Las Vegas’ Clark County Detention Center by the arresting officer, Paris Hilton was booked in record time.  In fact, she was in and out of the jail so fast that there’s been suspicion that Paris got special treatment because she was a celebrity. 

Special Treatment? At the Station….

Nope, says the guy that runs the detention center.  Well, no – they didn’t treat Paris special because she’s a tabloid star and she’s blonde and sells lots of perfume (her tenth scent just debuted in stores). No, it’s because of the chaos that having someone who guards and inmates and everyone else apparently wants to gawk at can disturb the internal operations of the Clark County Detention Center. 

Apparently, Paris was back on the streets in 3 hours because her presence was inherently disruptive, not because she’s the grand-niece to Elizabeth Taylor’s first husband or the frienemy of Kim Kardashian.   Paris Hilton: jail troublemaker, right?

Sure, Paris probably helped expedite things because she’s sorta experienced at getting booked.  There in Vegas, she posed for her third mugshot, after all.  And, it’s also true that having anyone around at any level of fame can be a hinderance — whether at the jail, or a restaurant, or in the mall. 

Special Treatment? At the Bust ….

However, it’s less clear that Paris got any special treatment at the scene of the bust.  Looks like the Vegas cops did their thing, and the heiress didn’t get to scoot away with a warning after signing a few autographs. 

CNN’s Nancy Grace has all the details of the bust: Paris opened the purse in front of a police officer, wanting some lip balm, and the alleged coke falls out in front of the cop.  Falls out.  You can’t make this stuff up. 

What’s interesting to ponder now are the media stories suggesting this is a publicity tactic to get Paris some of the tabloid territory that Lindsay Lohan and Kim Kardashian have had staked out for awhile now. 

People suggests that her mugshots might be “sarcastic”.  MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski’s just flat out opines that this arrest was planned in advance so Paris could get lots of publicity. 

A felony drug arrest?  Really?

So, let’s ponder what Nevada law enforcement’s gonna do here.  Felony cocaine possession is a serious crime.  Nevada will probably dot its i’s and cross its t’s to insure that there no future criticism of elected officials for treating Paris Hilton like she’s oh so special. 

Meanwhile, Paris is already demonstrating the defense made famous back in the 1970s by Texas legend Racehorse Haines: 

“Say you sue me because you say my dog bit you. Well, now this is my defense:

  • My dog doesn’t bite.  ["...that's not my purse"]
  • And second, in the alternative, my dog was tied up that night. ["...the contents of the purse aren't mine"]
  • And third, I don’t believe you really got bit. [you get the idea ....]
  • And fourth, I don’t have a dog.

Yeah. watching this story play out is gonna be fun.

July 21st, 2010

Texas Police Beating Citizens Once Again Caught on Video

Texas police violently beating citizens – it’s a story that is so commonplace in this state, it’s almost a tradition of sorts. However, with modern technology, violent cops are being caught more often — and when there is video, usually the media helps to spread the word.

This week, law enforcement officers in Paris, Texas, were videotaped in a prime example of police brutality after stopping Cornelius Gill and his friend. The video has received national coverage online (HuffPo) and on television (CBS News), which provides us all with this telling, and disturbing tale:

July 14th, 2010

Will Texas DWI Laws Finally Become Fair? Maybe.

Last week, Texas Senate Criminal Justice Committee Chairman John Whitmire finally acknowledged the elephant in the room of Texas drunk driving laws — what DWI law applies to you when you’re pulled over depends upon where you’ve been stopped.

As Whitmire explained to the media, “You need to be selective about where you want to get caught drinking, I guess.”

Driving Drunk? Better to Get Caught in Houston than New Braunfels

State Senator Whitmire is pointing the finger at how nonsensical the current DUI system is, telling the media,  “Why would the state of Texas have a criminal-justice system in Houston that will completely allow you to have no record, and in the New Braunfels experience, you do (have a record), and then you go to Bexar County and they don’t even file on you (for) DWI the first time?”

Houston DWI Practices

Over in Houston, the Harris County District Attorney has established a DWI program where first-timers pleading guilty to a DWI offense will be given a probated sentence, as well as mandatory alcohol treatment, community service, and one of those alcohol-testing ignition lock gizmos.  Do everything right, and the first timer’s conviction disappears.  Nothing on their driving record.   

Skip over to New Braunfels, Different Story

That’s the truth of it:  drive under the influence in Harris County, and you’ll walk away with zip on your record.  Do the exact same thing in New Braunfels, about 20 miles north of San Antonio on IH 35, and you’ll have a blight on your driving record for years to come. 

You get pulled over in New Braunfels for driving while intoxicated, and you’re gonna get a DWI on your record.  Which is a big deal, of course.  (Remember this at Wurstfest in November, the huge German sausage festival held in New Braunfels every year.)  

Whitmore points to unfairness of “checkerboard” DUI system coupled with the current legal surcharges.

Whitmire’s doing two things.  He’s blowing the lid off the various DUI prosecutorial treatments that exist in different parts of the state.  And, he’s calling for the Texas Legislature to repeal the Driver Responsibility Program.

We’ve written about these surcharges before.  There not cheap, and they’re not getting paid.  Currently, for a DWI conviction, the surcharge is $1,000 a year for three years for a first conviction; $1,500 a year for the second; and $2,000 a year for any conviction with a blood-alcohol content of 0.16 or greater.  You don’t pay, and your license gets suspended. 

All that means, of course, is that people who can’t afford to pay the surcharge just drive anyway – with a suspended license – hoping they won’t get caught. 

Can Whitmire Really Change Things from the Current DWI Unfairness?

John Whitmire is trying to change things.  Can he?  Well, Whitmire is becoming a congressional spokesperson for the blatant injustices that exist in the DWI / DUI system in Texas today.  He’s also using his position as Committee Chairman to create a group of experts to come up with recommendations for a truly uniform way of dealing with suspected drunk drivers in all the various 200+ Texas Counties.

What’s really going on here is District Attorneys trying to find creative ways to deal with budget problems and a huge backlog of drunk driving cases on their books.  So, it’s really about money.  Surprise. 

Will Whitmire be bold enough to address THAT elephant in the room?  We’ll see ….

May 19th, 2010

Fort Worth Makes Record Breaking $2,000,000 Settlement Offer in Cop Taser Killing of Michael Jacobs

Around a year ago, Michael Jacobs died after his family called the police to help them get Michael under control.  Michael was a dianosed schizophrenic, and his loved ones knew they needed help on that April afternoon. 

What they got instead was to witness a Fort Worth police officer Taser Michael to death when it appeared Michael might try and run away  – after the cops had sent away the EMS unit. 

That stun gun’s electric shock ran through Michael Jacobs’ body for 54 seconds.  After he fell to the ground, and had stopped breathing, the cops handcuffed him and called the ambulance to return.  By the way, Michael Jacobs was not armed.  He was just threatened to flee – to run off.  There’s no crime here, folks.

His mother and father witnessed their son’s stun gun death.  Imagine this afternoon for them.  Taking care of a mentally ill child, trying to protect him, and then watch your worst fears realized. 

Biggest Settlement Ever – From the City of Fort Worth

Yesterday, the Fort Worth City Council announced it was unanimously approving a settlement offer in the amount of $2,000,000 in the civil rights/wrongful death lawsuit filed by the parents of Michael Jacobs.  This is the biggest settlement that Fort Worth has ever paid for an death or injury caused by one of its own. 

By the way,  even though Michael Jacob’s death was clearly murder — the Tarrant County Medical Examiner ruled it a homicide — the Fort Worth Police Department cleared the police officers after their internal investigation.  And, a Tarrant County Grand Jury did not issue an indictment against the cops.

The City paid.  The cops didn’t.

April 28th, 2010

DWI Surcharges – Rules Changes Being Considered by Public Safety Commission

Today, the Texas Public Safety Commission continues its hearing all about the current Texas Driver Responsibility Program, which many (as in, many criminal judges) are reporting is the reason that there is around a 2 year backlog of DWI cases across the state — because those accused of driving drunk and charged with DWI (driving while intoxicated) are wanting trials and not taking a deal.  Seems the Program’s DWI Surcharges are causing lotsa problems out there.

What’s the DWI Surcharge? It’s Thousands of Dollars and It Covers 3 Years AFTER the DWI Conviction 

Right now, Texas drivers convicted of DWI (driving while intoxicated) as well as a couple of other violations (driving without a driver’s license, or one that’s invalid; as well as driving without insurance) must pay automatic surcharges every year, for three years from the date of conviction.

And it isn’t cheap: for a DWI conviction, the surcharge is $1,000 a year for three years for a first conviction; $1,500 a year for the second; and $2,000 a year for any conviction with a blood-alcohol content of 0.16 or greater. That’s big money, right?

People Aren’t Paying the Surcharges

It’s not news to those involved in DWI work that people aren’t paying these surcharges.  However, everyone may not know that state-wide, over $1 billion hasn’t been paid.  One billion dollars in unpaid surcharges – no wonder they’re having some hearings down in Austin.

Why aren’t people paying? 

Some can’t afford it.  Some think it’s just wrong or stupid to be asked to pay for up to three years after they’ve already been convicted.  They’ll just drive without a license rather than fork over the surcharge.

Surcharges and DWI Trial Backlogs also Impact Pending DWI Cases: Dismissals, Lesser Offenses

In the face of balloon-bursting DWI trial dockets, criminal judges and prosecutors have become creative in how to deal with drunk driver cases that are brought before them.  Judges are dismissing more cases, and lots of DWI cases are getting lesser charges — like reckless driving. 

And apparently, dismissing cases and negotiating down to lesser charges isn’t solving the DWI docket program — or the problem that there’s a $1 billion dollar account receivable on the State Budget.   You go figure which is the driving factor here.

Hearing Continues Today

Whatever the impetus, the hearing is continuing today.  According to Grits for Breakfast, most everyone there is hankering for a change.  The only ones that like things the way they are, apparently, are hospital representatives.  They want to maximize money from surcharges going to hospital trauma centers.  

Let’s watch and see what happens….

March 24th, 2010

Hank Skinner Execution Still Set 4 Today – France Is Asking for Delay. That’s Right. France.

There’s been lots of news coverage over the impending execution by the State of Texas of 47-year-old Hank Skinner, who has been sentenced to death for the murder of his girlfriend and her two adult sons back on New Year’s Eve 1993. 

Hank Skinner says he’s innocent.  He’s asking for DNA testing to be done.  Seems there were knives and things at the scene of the crime that hold DNA evidence — but no one has ever checked that evidence against Skinner’s DNA to confirm his claim of innocence. 

Right now, there is a request pending before the United States Supreme Court, based on this evidence issue, which would get Skinner a stay.  As this is being typed, there’s no news from Washington, D.C. that Skinner’s getting a response from them. 

There’s also a request setting on Governor Rick Perry’s desk.  Skinner is asking the Governor to give him a 30 day reprieve, so this DNA testing can be done.  Again, checking the news as this post is being typed — zip from Austin.

However, there has been one bit of news:  the Ambassador of France — yep, FRANCE — has officially asked Governor Perry to grant the reprieve or just go ahead and pardon Skinner.  It gets better.  Seems Skinner is married to a French woman, and the PRESIDENT of France has also offered his support to Mrs. Skinner, Sandrine Ageorges-Skinner.   Wow.

You’d think that if the idea that an innocent man might be fixin’ to die at the hands of a Texas executioner would be enough for Governor Perry to halt things and do some DNA testing.   Here it is, lunchtime on Execution Day and we’re hearing zip.  So, maybe the fact that an entire country is asking for a double check to be done might sway things. 

Of course, they can’t vote in November.  They’re French. 

Our thoughts and prayers go to Hank Skinner, his legal team, and his family.  May God bless you all on this terrible day.

March 3rd, 2010

Tim Cole Pardon Granted by Gov Rick Perry: Will Lessons be Learned?

Of course, the big news today when you’re talking Governor Rick Perry is that he’s just won the Republican Primary without the need of a runoff.   Guess that makes sense. 

Finally, Tim Cole is Pardoned

However, on Monday something else happened.  Governor Perry signed the pardon of Timothy Cole, the first person in the State of Texas to be cleared of wrongdoing by DNA evidence after his death. 

If you follow this blog, then you’re aware that there was some problem getting here: arguments were made that the Governor had no legal right to grant this pardon, the Attorney General said so, and there was a major brouhaha before justice was done. 

What Will We Learn from the Tim Cole Tragedy?

Now that the pardon has indeed been granted, and the family of Tim Cole has achieved victory in his vindication, there are still questions that should be asked — lessons to be learned from the life of Tim Cole. 

Here are a couple:

1.  At Grits for Breakfast, there is much discussion on how many more Tim Coles are there?  How many more false convictions are on the books right now, with innocent men and women behind bars standing firm on their innocence?

It’s a good question.  With crime labs in the chaotic state they are these days, it’s debatable whether or not DNA testing can be trusted in cases pending before the court.  Who is going to undertake the process of vindication through DNA testing of folk who are already behind bars?  The Innocence Project of Texas does this — but their resources are limited, and they have to choose their cases accordingly. 

Tim Cole Lesson No. 1:  There’s a way to get innocent folk out of prison through DNA testing, but we’ve got to figure out how to do it, and who is going to pay for it – and how to secure their release through appeal or pardon once the test results are back.  Part of the expense is the judicial process AFTER the test reveals their innocence.  It’s not just a matter of taking a lab report to the prison and getting someone released. 

2.  At the Burnt Orange Report, discussion is had over Tim Cole’s case showing us once again how eyewitness identifications simply cannot be trusted as reliable evidence.  In Cole’s case, a young woman traumatized by rape picked Tim Cole in a photo lineup.  She was wrong.  The man who raped her later admitted the crime, and many years later, that victim came face to face with her perpetrator – all as part of the efforts to exonerate and free Tim Cole. 

Tim Cole Lesson 2:  Eyewitness testimony simply should not be trusted as evidence in a criminal case.  This should be absolutely paramount when it is the key piece of evidence that the State is using to put someone behind bars for any period of time, much less placing them on Death Row.  Human beings do not have trustworthy recollections of events, this has been proven time and time again.  When will the judicial system finally recognize just how flawed finger-pointing is?  Who knows.  Until they do, criminal defense attorneys must fight, and fight hard, against the probative value of any “eyewitness” — and perhaps pointing the finger at the Tim Cole case may help place this “evidence” in its proper perspective.

February 17th, 2010

Pardon for Innocent Man Tim Cole, Who Died in Prison Before Exonerated, May Happen. Finally.

Tim Cole did not rape the Texas Tech student over in Lubbock, back in 1985.  Jerry Wayne Johnson, according to his own confession as well as DNA evidence, committed this crime. 

Didn’t matter.  Tim Cole was arrested, charged, convicted, and imprisoned for the girl’s rape.  One day, Tim Cole was a student with a future at Texas Tech University.  The next day, he was a criminal — and he never had his second chance. 

Tim Cole died from complications due to asthma, still maintaining his innocence, in 1999.  He was 39. 

Now, 11 years later, Tim Cole’s family still seeks justice on his behalf.  They want Tim Cole to be pardoned by the Governor, even if it will be posthumously.  At first, Governor Rick Perry said he couldn’t do it — that the Governor is only allowed to pardon in cases of treason or impeachment, and legally his hands were tied.   This, according to Attorney General Greg Abbott.

The Governor May Still Issue a Pardon for Tim Cole

Now, The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles may open the way to the elusive pardon, based upon an application filed by the Innocence Project of Texas.  Included within that application is the official clearing of Tim Cole’s name by an Austin state district judge.  The Texas Board will then issue a recommendation that Cole be pardoned to Governor Perry, who has already implied he’s going to pardon Tim Cole based upon the Board’s recommendation.

The Tim Cole Act – One Good Result From This Travesty of Justice

While the Cole family hasn’t taken any compensation from the Tim Cole Act, one good thing that has resulted from their efforts to bring justice to Tim Cole has been the passage of the Tim Cole Act.  Under this law, wrongly convicted individuals are compensated by the State of Texas as follows:

  1. $80,000 for each year of incarceration; and
  2. $80,000 lifetime annuity (variables here on life expectancy and other things).

Condolences to the Tim Cole Family – and Congratulations, too

Continued sympathies to the family and loved ones of Tim Cole, especially his mother Ruby Session, and heartfelt congratulations on a fight well fought.  And, tip of the hat to Austin District Judge Charlie Baird (who has also served as a justice on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals) who had the integrity and courage to issue the first posthumous DNA exoneration judgment in the state’s history.

January 18th, 2010

Will the US Supreme Court Reverse Itself on Defense Examination of Crime Lab Techs?

Last week, we pondered the trustworthiness of crime labs in Texas – or more accurately, how inaccurate their results can be.  One good bit of news in all that mess is the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 129 S.Ct. 2527 (2009), where just this summer the Highest Court in the Land decided that criminal defense attorneys could cross-examine lab techs on their lab reports.

For many, it was shocking that defense attorneys weren’t already allowed the chance to question lab technicians on the witness stand about their lab results.  (One more example of how CSI isn’t based in reality.)  Well, here’s something even more shocking: the U.S. Supreme Court may change its mind.

That’s right.  The Supreme Court may take back the right of a defense attorney to cross-examine crime lab pros. 

Melendez-Diaz was just argued this summer.  (Interestingly, Massachusetts’ Martha Coakley argued on behalf of the prosecution – you can watch the oral arguments at Oyez.org.  Yes, this is the same Martha Coakley that is rumored to be losing her battle with Republican Scott Brown in tomorrow’s special election to fill Teddy Kennedy’s vacant Senate seat.)   

Well, the U.S. Supreme Court granted – and heard – oral argument in another case just last week:  Briscoe v. Virginia (07-11191).  Briscoe is a consolidation of two cases, and it was argued by the Virginia Solicitor General for the prosecution.  The two cases in Briscoe both dealt with ”certificates of analysis” from state crime labs without any forensic scientists taking the witness stand at the defendants’ trials.  At issue, can the prosecution present evidence of illegal drugs (which is what the certificates claimed were found) without calling the human beings who did the forensic testing? 

In these situations, criminal defense attorneys have to make a decision – should they stipulate to the certificates as being truthful, without questioning the lab techs?  Sometimes, this may be smart.  Sometimes, a good defense lawyer wants that crime lab tech on the stand.

What Will Happen to Melendez-Diaz now? 

There are critics who argue that Melendez-Diaz was a wrong decision, that it was decided too fast and without sufficient consideration of the expense and confusion that forcing forensic technicians out of their labs and into courtrooms would raise.  They’re excited that the Supreme Court will correct what they see as an error — particularly with Justice Sotomayor on the court now. 

However, there are a great many criminal defense attorneys that aren’t happy about these rumblings.  As Justice Scalia pointed out during last week’s Briscoe arguments, not putting those crime lab reports up for cross-examination is tantamount to “trial by affidavit.” 

Without examination, these untrustworthy crime lab results are merely “trial by affidavit.”

Look, there’s a reason to put a human on the stand in these situations.  Crime lab analysis is scientific in nature and there aren’t many scientists in the courtroom, usually.  Those pieces of paper that pop out of labs are already known to be unreliable, and defense attorneys MUST have the opportunity to have that crime lab technician or forensic scientist on the witness stand to explain what was done, and why the results are (or aren’t) accurate. 

We cannot bow to worship crime lab reports as inviolate.  Let us only hope that the United States Supreme Court uses Briscoe to support Melendez-Diaz, and not to erase the victory for justice that Melendez-Diaz represents.