Archive for the ‘Cop Watch’ Category

March 8th, 2010

500+ Guns Missing From Texas Police Dept Evidence Room – FBI, Texas Rangers Investigating

It all started when a pawn shop over in Humble, Texas, was subjected to a search by the Department of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives.  ATF had a warrant, and they took possession of 112 guns that — come to find out — were last seen in the evidence locker of a Texas police department.

How’d they get into a pawn shop from a police evidence room? No one knew, and an investigation began.

Now, it seems that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Texas Rangers are working together to solve this mystery.  Their latest tally?  Over 500 guns are missing from the Cleveland Police Department. 

While the FBI and the Texas Rangers both keep their ongoing investigations pretty darn quiet until they’re good and ready to reveal things, they do have to file a document in court now and then in order to do their job. And, the media has been monitoring court documents with both the Dallas Morning News and the Houston Chronicle keeping tabs on this Missing Gun Mystery.

Piecemealing so far, we know that a Liberty County Sheriff’s Department Captain, name of Harold Kelley, together with some others whose names we don’t know (yet) were allegedly in a gun-trafficking scheme.  Seems Captain Kelley was the Custodian of the Evidence Room, and had one of only two keys for the place.  Who had the other key?  Man name of Henry Patterson …  Henry was serving as the assistant police chief at the time. 

And, here’s the smoking gun — Kelley’s signature was on the official evidence files for 98 of those guns found in the Humble pawn shop.  He’d signed to confirm that the guns had been destroyed.

What about the rest of the 500?  The Texas Rangers and the FBI are out there, looking for them.  Betcha they find them, too ….

January 27th, 2010

Can We Trust the Prosecution to Play Fair? No.

When you watch TV, the prosecutors are always the good guys.  Just check out Law & Order, for example.  Heroes, right? Well, things are different out in the real world.

Policeman Gives Sworn Statement, Dallas County Prosecutor Told Him (as Sole Eyewitness) Who to Point Out At Trial

Just this past week, another Texas scandal involving the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office is brewing. The ONLY eyewitness in a trial back in 1995 has now come forward, and given a sworn statement that the prosecutor coached the witness to take the stand and point the finger at defendant Richard Miles.

The “eyewitness” is now a police officer in Oklahoma, has signed an affidavit just this month, swearing that he was told where Mr. Miles would be sitting in the courtroom, and that he needed to point the finger at this man — even though the guy in the courtroom didn’t look like the man that Miles saw shoot a pistol into a car, killing one man and injuring another.

Miles isn’t going to be released based upon this Oklahoma cop’s affidavit because he’s already out — freed after 14 years behind bars — because a memo was discovered in an old Dallas County District Attorney file that identified someone else as the suspect … a memo that was never, ever turned over to the defense.

And this happens everywhere, apparently, since just this past week, over in Fort Lauderdale  ….

Before someone starts labeling this a rogue incident, an exception the rule of prosecutors being trustworthy, consider this new story that hit the stands this same week.  Over in Florida, the Public Defenders Office – supported by the Broward County Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers – has made public a letter that was sent to the office of State Attorney Mike Satz.  In it, the Public Defender’s Office flat out accuses the Florida prosecutors of routinely playing outside the rules.

The letter charges, in part, that the state attorneys there are not only routinely holding back evidence from defense attorneys that is helpful to the defendants, but they’re also covering up for bad cops and helping out those who come through their offices who happen to be of a higher socioeconomic level — the rich and powerful. (And you thought this only happened on Miami Vice reruns.)

The letter was sent just last Tuesday by Public Defender Howard Finkelstein, where he writes that he’s been forced “…to the inescapable conclusion that the [Florida] State Attorney’s Office, either through neglect or by design, has been non-compliant with its obligation to disclose favorable evidence to criminal defendants.”

Just Some Bad Actors, or Corruption in the System?  Hmmmm……

Of course, some might say that Broward County is a bad example.  It’s been labeled corrupt, and over the past two years alone there have been five arrests of elected officials, six cops have been sent to prison, and the city manager’s been tagged for embezzling a half-million bucks.

But then, maybe they haven’t been watching the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office much.  Heck, just last month the county commissioners voted to settle the lawsuit brought against Dallas County by a former investigator in the DA’s office, who had sued for wrongful termination alleging that he’d been fired for reporting the unethical behavior in the Dallas DA’s Office.

Curiouser and curiouser….

January 20th, 2010

Irving Cop Pleads Guilty to Defrauding Feds

You know they thought this was a great idea, maybe even genius.  The Department of Housing and Urban Development up in Washington, D.C. implemented a program where law enforcement officers could get a house at HALF-PRICE as long as they bought a home in a pre-selected neighborhood, known to be less than stellar. 

That’s right: cops could buy a house for 50 cents on the dollar, as long as they bought in certain sections of town, and lived in the home for 36+ straight months.  It’s called the Good Neighbor Next Door/Officer Next Door program. 

It didn’t turn out so well for Irving police officer Ramon Anthony Reyes, Jr.

Over in Irving, a cop named Ramon Reyes, Jr. learned of the HUD program and got ideas.  On the force since 1998, Reyes knew the local area and its crime statistics well enough. He also knew his real estate.

In 1998, Officer Reyes bought a home in Grand Prairie.  In 2007, he bought another home, using the HUD funds, on Palo Alto Drive in Mesquite.   Officer Reyes transfered the title of the Grand Prairie house to his uncle … but he never moved from there, never changed over the utilities, and still paid the property taxes on the Grand Prairie residence.  Du-oh!!!!

Officer Reyes was caught by the federales and charged with filing a false statement with HUD (you know, where he swore he was living in the HUD house).  He pled guilty.  Now, he’s not a cop (he resigned on January 5th) and he’s facing two years in the federal pen plus a fine of $250,000.  He’s scheduled to be sentenced in April. 

Is Reyes the only one who’s seeing the HUD Program as an Investment Vehicle?

As for the HUD Program, it’s open not only to cops, but also to pre-Kindergarten through 12th grade teachers and firefighters/emergency medical technicians so they can “contribute to community revitalization” by buying homes in these “declining” communities and live there for three years. 

Now, three years (36 months) isn’t a short trip – but is anyone else thinking that Reyes’ idea of using the program as a way to get real estate cheap wasn’t that unique?  He may have not followed the requirements, but it would be interesting to see how many of these homeowners aren’t just landlords for houses they got cheap as soon as their 36 month stint is up.

January 6th, 2010

Cop Watch: The Mystery of Ex-Police Chief Michael Meissner – Is He a Sexual Predator or the Victim of a Vendetta?

This week, lawman and Dallas resident Michael Meissner was back in the news as the controversy surrounding his arrest and the subsequent dismissal of all charges refuses to die.

In September, while in the role of Police Chief of Little River Academy (a small town near Waco), Meissner was arrested on the charges of promotion of prostitution, possession and promotion of child pornography and sexual performance of a child. Evidence supporting the Tarrant Country charges allegedly included text messages sent by Meissner to young boys, inviting them to sex parties (whatever that means).

Meissner resigned as chief of police following his arrest.  He sat in Dallas County Jail for one week, and then all charges were dropped and he walked out the doors a free man — and he’s stayed that way.  Neither the Dallas County District Attorney nor the Tarrant County District Attorney are going to prosecute this guy. 

Meissner’s position is that this is all based on a vendetta that’s been pursued by a fellow cop, John Hoskins — who by the way, was the investigating officer that allegedly found the sex party invitation texts involving Meissner, while he investigating another law enforcement officer who was with the Combine Police Department.

Meanwhile, as the mystery continues, video of the cops executing a search warrant on Meissner’s home and the involvement of Kopbusters in the whole story is playing on YouTube.  This is the same Kopbusters who exposed the corruption in the Odessa Police Department last year,and you can watch them in the Meissner sting here: 

December 28th, 2009

Cop Watch: FBI Investigating the Bexar County Sheriff’s Dept – San Antonio Probe Growing for Past 2 Years

Today, the San Antonio Express News is reporting that for the past 2 years, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has been quietly investigating the activities of the Bexar County Sheriff’s Department — a law enforcement agency whose jurisdiction includes San Antonio, Texas, and the surrounding area.  Apparently, the FBI has been snooping around there, down by the Alamo, for 2 years now and there’s no signs they’re stopping.

Looks like this may be a big deal….

Not only does the time involved in this FBI probe alone suggest that a lot of bad stuff has been discovered by the Feds, the media reports are suggesting it.  The Express-News points to deputies living a lot larger than their county salaries would allow, with groups going on vacation to Las Vegas and the discovery of one deputy’s large land purchase (bet it’s a ranch) down in the Valley.

FBI Initially Looking Into One Thing, Discoveries Kept Coming According to Express-News Reports

Careful to reference several sources for their news reports – since the FBI won’t comment on an ongoing investigation – the Express News reveals that the FBI began checking into complaints about civil rights violations, and things grew from there.   According to the sources, there are lots of complaints about the BCSD narcotics division — particularly, a group of 4 -5 “rogue cops” who are arresting folk without cause, stealing money and property, etc.  

They may be doing bad things both on the job and off — there aren’t a lot of details yet.  It is reported that deputies who are working second jobs as security guards at local apartment complexes have shaken down the tenants there.  Wow.  There are also complaints off-duty deputies have used threats that are backed by the fact that work for the Sheriff’s Dept. and that they’ve used excessive forces.

Who All Knows and Looks the Other Way Regarding the Rouge Cops?

Apparently, there are also FBI feelers checking out who all may know about these rouges within the department but are not coming forward to stop the wrongdoing.    FBI agents are even going so far as to interview criminal defense attorneys practicing in the criminal courtrooms of the Bexar County Courthouse to see what they may know about these bad actors. 

Looks Like the Pot is About to Boil Over ….

According to the Express-News, several Bexar County Sheriff’s Department deputies have already hired criminal defense lawyers to represent them — and we all know, you don’t start paying for a criminal lawyer until things are pretty far along.

This looks to be a major story that is just breaking today — hats off to Guillermo Contreras of the San Antonio Express News along with Staff Writer Eva Ruth Moravec for their work here.

December 21st, 2009

DA Watch: Yolanda Madden Freed by Judge After 4 Yrs – DA Failed to Turn Over Exculpatory Evidence

You may remember the case of Yolanda Madden because of the notorious YouTube video awhile back showing the Odessa cops being caught on video by Kopbusters.  (We wrote about the Kopbusters story last December and you can watch the video on that post). 

Well, after being in jail for four years — yep, 4 YEARS — Yolanda Madden is once again enjoying her freedom after Federal District Judge Rob Junell vacated her sentence. 

The Smoking Gun that was hidden from the defense

While the federal judge wouldn’t go so far as to accuse the prosecution of intentionally hiding the Smoking Gun documentary evidence, no one could argue its existence.  What was it? 

A log sheet.  A simple, routine log sheet of the Odessa Police Department.  The big deal about the log sheet is the absence of a key name on its roster.  Odessa Police Deparment Officer Greg Travland testified at Madden’s trial that she confessed to him — but the Smoking Gun log sheet reveals that Travland was NOT in the police station at the time. 

Of course, this story gets worse.

Yolanda Madden consistently claimed that drugs were planted on her.  She told this to anyone who would listen — loudly.  Her husband spent the family’s life savings in support of his wife, believing that she had been set-up. 

A drug informant ADMITTED that he was the one who planted the drugs (crystal meth) on Yolanda Madden.  Madden took a polygraph and passed.  So did the informant.  Madden took hair follicle and urine drug tests.  No evidence of drugs. 

Law enforcement didn’t care.  Madden was still tried and convicted. 

Madden’s Family Sought the Help of Barry Cooper’s Kopbusters

Frustrated and feeling powerless, Madden’s father asked Kopbusters to come to Odessa and help them fight the injustice.  Kopbusters did — and the result was their now-famous video of the Odessa cops entering a phony drug house set up by the Kopbusters.  For details on how the Odessa cops fell prey to the Kopbusters, check out our December 10, 2008, post where Kopbusters founder (and former cop) Barry Cooper gives all the details.

What Happens Now? Get this — another trial has been set.

Let’s recap:

1. Kopbusters demonstrate that the Odessa cops play fast and loose with the law in drug cases;

2.  an informant gives testimony in court that he planted drugs on Yolanda Madden;

3.  the informant passes a polygraph;

4.  Yolanda passes a polygraph;

5.  Yolanda tests clean in hair follicle testing;

6.  Yolanda tests clean in urine testing; and

7.  the cop who claims Yolanda confessed to him wasn’t even at the police station at the time of the purported “confession,” as revealed by a log sheet NOT PROVIDED TO THE DEFENSE during trial….

and the federal judge schedules a new trial for Yolanda Madden, set for March 1, 2010.  They’re going to try her AGAIN?

What’s Really Going On Here?

It’s already being reported that the real story behind all this is the cops mistook Yolanda Madden for a drug dealer they nicknamed “the Ice Queen,” and used the informant with a bag of meth (which he handed over to Yolanda) as a way to bust this notorious Poison Ivy of Odessa. 

Sure looks like they got the wrong girl and they’re finding it very, very hard to admit they’ve made a mistake. 

Someone — like the Attorney General, the Texas Rangers, or the FBI — should help them.

December 7th, 2009

Cop Watch: Two Independent Incidents of Local Cops Facing Assault Charges, Are Our Cops Dangerous?

While it may be the fodder for many a TV cop show, it’s also the basis of many an academic research study:  the behavior of police officers both on and off duty, and how their unique psychological situations may make them more prone to violent behavior.  Last week, we had two cops making the news for their off-hours exploits – misplaced aggression that put them over the line.

First, a Dallas cop was arrested last week over in Duncanville for misdemeanor assault based upon family violence.  This female police officer was allegedly involved in a domestic dispute with her husband and the Duncanville police not only were sent to her home, but arrested her for an assault charge that could carry one year’s imprisonment and a $4000 fine if she is convicted.  According to media reports, her husband had visible injuries and the arrest occurred only after both husband and wife were interviewed.  Officer Barbara Ann Chandler remains on the job with the Dallas Police Department as these charges progress in Duncanville; however, she’s on desk duty. 

Second, former Dallas cop Randy Anderson just get sentenced to 45 days in jail with 4 years probation (deferred adjudication) and a $1500 fine for an event that occured back in December 2007 involving country music singer Steve Holy.  A Dallas police officer at the time, Anderson was off duty and allegedly drinking with fellow off duty cop Paul Loughridge when things got messy.  (Loughridge is still awaiting trial.)  Seems Anderson, Holy, and some others were drinking festive beverages at Holy’s home after meeting up at a nearby bar, according to media reports, when Anderson demanded identification from Holy – who didn’t readily comply – resulting in Anderson drawing his weapon and pointing his gun at Holy.  Anderson was convicted for aggravated assault.  (Randy Anderson’s employment with the Dallas Police Department was terminated after the incident. )

This two stories are just from last week … but what are they telling us about off-duty cops being dangerous?

The domestic violence story regarding Dallas Police Officer Barbara Ann Chandler and the aggravated assault conviction of former Dallas cop Randy Anderson should be a rarity, right?  But they’re not. 

Cops themselves recognize the murkiness of that line between on-duty and off-duty behavior (see e.g., “12 Rules for Off Duty Conduct” by Lindsey Bertomen“) and law enforcement organizations study “…the impossible mandate of police work in a free society,” (see The Challenge of Selecting Tomorrow’s Police Officers from Generations X and Y by Francis McCafferty, M.D. in the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law). 

Do a quick Google search for “off duty cops dangerous” and read story after story in this country about police officers being very, very dangerous on their off-time. 

Perhaps the question isn’t if Dallas cops are dangerous, but if all cops that are off-duty should be considered powder kegs?  Imagine the wife of the Texas police chief who Tasered her at home last April would say “yes” to that question ….

November 30th, 2009

Cop Watch: State Agency Bulletin Reveals Texas Police Officers May Not Know Current Laws

You leave your house to go to work, to school, to the grocery store.  And you assume that the police officer parked at the intersection or standing watch on the corner knows his stuff.  He or she is there to protect and serve, and you’re confident that they know the laws that they are enforcing.  Right?  Right.

And you’d be wrong.  Wrong.

Earlier this month, the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Standards and Education (TCLEOSE) issued a state-wide bulletin.  The bulletin went to every police academy across the state — all 103 of them.  In it, the Commission warns those who are teaching police officers their Texas law that they teach the cadets using CURRENT LAW. 

That’s right.  Apparently, police academies have been teaching officers from outdated law books and they’ve been using curriculums that don’t jive with the current state laws and regulations. 

How long has this been going on?  For years, apparently — since this brouhaha started over the Texas Sodomy Law, which was removed from the Texas lawbooks over six years ago.  Seems a Texas police officer told a gay rights group that the sodomy law was still good, an academy class was still teaching the law to academy students. 

That one conversation has led to this Commission Bulletin being released this month.

Now, let’s see what the media folk turn up — surely some enterprising reporter will be combing thru the Police Academy textbooks and teaching curriculums to see what else the police are being taught today …. 

November 23rd, 2009

Cop Watch: Suicide by Cop Happens in Texas – or Does It?

Today, the Texas Rangers are investigating the deaths of two young men who were killed by a policeman’s bullets.

A 28-year-old and a 30-year-old both killed by police gunfire in the past two weeks

The Rangers are involved in determining what happened in the shooting death of 28 year old Tabaris Brown in Childress, Texas, on Saturday as well as the shooting death of 30 year old Jaime Almaguer in New Braunfels two weeks ago.

The Death of Tabaris Brown

According to media reports, Brown died in a restaurant parking lot on US 287, where he stopped his vehicle after a chase with police. Exiting the vehicle, Brown is said to have had a gun in his hands according to at least one eyewitness who is not a cop — and that Brown raised his gun toward the officers. Ballistics is testing whether or not Brown fired his weapon at the police before they opened fire on Brown.   

The Rangers’ spokesman has told the media that their investigation has revealed at least one friend and one family member that substantiate the fact that Brown did travel with a loaded gun in his car.  (In case you were wondering about a plant. Good question, right?)

The Death of Jaime Almaguer

Newspapers across the state are monitoring the story of Jaime Almaguer, who was shot and killed by police while he was standing in the southbound lane of IH35 as the highway travels through New Braunfels.  Almaguer died on the freeway early on the morning of November 11th, and traffic headed toward San Antonio and Mexico-way was blocked from the roadway crime scene for much of that Wednesday. 

Almaguer was being sought by police for questioning in the death of his alleged girlfriend, Jennifer Trader, whose body had been found in her San Antonio apartment with a single gunshot wound to the head.  Law enforcement purportedly was about to give up their manhunt for Almaguer, when he was spotted walking along the IH35 access road  in New Braunfels. 

According to media reports, Almaguer had not only told relatives in New Braunfels that he had killed somebody in San Antonio, but he was also in communication with law enforcement as their manhunt progressed, and Almaguer is said to have told New Braunfels police that he was armed and he wanted a shootout with the cops. 

Where these two incidents of Suicide by Cop? The Texas Rangers Will Find Out ….

It is sad but true that there are occasions where individuals have lost their trust in the criminal justice system of this country to such a degree that they cannot fathom facing arrest and teaming with a criminal defense attorney to fight against the charges.  (Defense lawyers CAN help, but clients have to call, take that first step.)

Instead, these tragic souls decide to take a stand against law enforcement in a doomed scenario, where they are knowingly outmanned and outgunned.  These situations have come to be known as “suicide by cop.”

It is also sad but true that there are also occasions where individuals are killed by police and the shootout is labeled a “suicide by cop” to cover up an error of law enforcement, with a gun left convincingly close to the victim’s body.  Many are suspicious of events where the police kill individuals – especially when their loved ones’ deaths are then investigated by the police department’s internal affairs division.    A question can be raised regarding the rising trend of Suicide by Cop — is it real? 

The Texas Rangers are an independent organization, with a steady reputation of working with federal agencies as need be (we’ve posted about these joint efforts many times) to find and stop corruption within the Texas criminal justice system.  Based upon media reports, they have a plethora of potential evidence in the New Braunfels shooting: e.g., videotapes taken during the manhunt, audiotapes of the conversations that the suspect had with police prior to the shooting. 

Whether or not Almaguer’s death was a suicide by cop should be easily determined (and from media reports, it does appear to fit into the Suicide by Cop pattern – especially the taped admissions by the decedent that he wanted to engage in a shootout). 

However, the Childress killing does not appear to be so easily investigated.  Curious by its absence are any video or audio of the altercation between the police and Brown in that restaurant parking lot.  Those police car dashboard cams?  The cameras weren’t pointed in the right direction, says Childress Police Chief Reece Bowen, so they didn’t capture the event on tape.  And the audio? It wasn’t working.  Bowen says his equipment is old, and just wasn’t working.  That they’re a “poverty level police department.” 

Which makes it a bigger job for the Texas Rangers, doesn’t it?  Wonder what the media will be reporting about the gun found with Brown, and the story that its spent shell casings (if any) at the scene have to tell ….

November 18th, 2009

Cop Watch: The Saga of Dallas County Constables Jaime Cortes and Derick Evans – Dan Wyde Enters the Fray

Earlier this month, we looked at Dallas County Constables Jaime Cortes and Derick Evans because they have filed legal arguments with the court (which are set for hearing on November 23rd) that the Dallas County Commissioners do not have the legal right to investigate county constables.  Our concern at the time was the taking of the constables’ computers, with all the information contained on the hard drives being seen by who knows how many folk — and the possible privacy invasions that are occuring regarding innocent people wrongfully charged or investigated. 

Computer Privacy and Towing Contracts and Who’s Investigating Who

Back in August, we looked at the same two Dallas County Constables, wondering if District Attorney Craig Watkins was going to investigate Constable Cortes or Constable Evans after the big write-up in the Dallas Morning News about their alleged connections with the Dowdy Ferry Auto Services (a towing company).  

Interestingly, the investigation that’s making all the press this month isn’t anything that DA Watkins has done — it’s the Dallas County Commissioners own investigation that is causing the brouhaha, and attorneys for the Commissioners will be in the courtroom on November 23rd, not lawyers from the District Attorney’s office. 

Well, there’s another twist in the story of County Constables Cortes and Evans as of last week.   

Now, the Dallas Morning News has reported that formal contracts exist between these two Constables (for Precincts 1 and 5) and the Dowdy Ferry Auto Services.  But the big part of the News’ story doesn’t appear to be the contract so much as the attorney representing the towing company:  Dan Wyde.   The newspaper’s online version goes so far as to reference its 2006 story on attorney Wyde, from when he was running for District Attorney, and all the controversies that surround him. 

So many things to ponder here.  And many of them are found in the Comments to the DMN story….